Following the flawed results of the latest organic food study, the media is now going beyond trashing organic food and now directly attacking organic food consumers as a whole.
The New York Times has gone as far as to say that health conscious organic food consumers are 'narcissistic' and goes on to pretend that organic food is actually no different than GMO-containing conventional.
I outlined in my previous video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PmqUA8qfRQ) how the organic food study by Stanford actually revealed that organic food contained less pesticides and antibiotic-resistant bacteria than conventional. In addition, it didn't even examine key factors like GMOs and mercury-containing high-fructose corn syrup.
Nevertheless, many publications are continuing to spin the study to claim that organic food poses no health benefit, which is seriously endangering the health of many consumers who may not know all of the details.
For full sourcing and more information, please visit:http://naturalsociety.com/ridiculous-study-claims-organic-same-as-conventional/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't Troll, if you can't add anything helpful, don't post.