http-equiv='refresh'/> Consfearacynewz: Amerika IS Already Under Martial Law

Monday, August 6, 2012

Amerika IS Already Under Martial Law

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO READ WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT TO DIGEST. ALL OUR LIFE WE HAVE BEEN LIVING UNDER A LIE TO KEEP US ENSLAVED. THE TRUTH IS  NOW KNOWN. THE PROBLEM IS, WHAT DO WE DO NOW? LIKE YOU, I BECAME AWARE OF THIS SAME TRUTH TODAY AND I DON’T WHERE TO GO FROM HERE.
YESTERDAY I LEARNED JUDGES IN CALIFORNIA ARE NOT “PUBLIC OFFICIALS”  I WANTED TO KNOW WHY, IF THEY ARE ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE.
NOW I KNOW WHY, AND SO WILL YOU AFTER READING THIS INFORMATION.
IT WILL TAKE MANY EDUCATED AND CREATIVE MINDS TO SOLVE OUR PROBLEM. I PRAY YOU ARE UP TO THE CHALLENGE.

Further proof that martial law remained in effect after the Civil War can be found in the "Congressional Globe" (now called the "Congressional Record").  The following are excerpts from the April 20th through 29th, 1870 "Congressional Globe" concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to CONTINUE TO CARRY OUT MARTIAL LAW nearly five years after the end of the Civil War:

"The following bureaus shall be established in this department [the Department of Justice]:  a Bureau of International Law, a Bureau of Revenue Law, a Bureau of Military and Naval Law, a Bureau of Postal Law, a Bureau of Land Management Law."

Congressman Lawrence then said in the record:
   "This Bill, however, does transfer to the Law Department, or the Department of Justice as it is now called, the cognizance of all subjects of martial law, and the cognizance of all subjects of military and naval law, except that portion of the administration of military justice which relates to military court martial, their proceedings, and the supervision of records.

   "If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of  government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice.  It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of  the Army.  He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion of the administration of  military law which relates to military justice. 

   "In other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the status of the states of the union, their right to call upon the government for military protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional questions, will be limited.  The Judge Advocate General will perform duties administrative in their character and almost exclusively so.

   "But I will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the Judge Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has been proposed in this Bill.  If this had been done, the Bill would have encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled in the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this Bureau untouched in their official tenure in order that this Bill might get through Congress.

   "But so far as the Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General is concerned, he is transferred with all his supervisory power over naval court partials and the records and proceedings of such courts, so that to that extent, this Bill accomplishes the great purpose which it has in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government. It is misfortunate that there should be different constructions of the laws of the United States by different law officers of the United States."

WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT:

These traitors knew they would have encountered opposition from the military with the provisions of H.R. 1328, so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during their tenure, and transfer them to supervisory positions over court partials.  This appeased the military leaders, who didn't have the foggiest idea as to what was really going on.

Had the traitors fleeced the military of all their powers during their tenure in office, the military would have realized and possibly taken some military action.  But as nothing was happening at the hen house, they slept through this entire situation which resulted in an overthrow of the Constitution -- an overthrow under which government pretended to operate in 1933, and under which it continues to pretend to operate today.

The traitors were now faced with a very serious problem, namely, what to do with the powers of the Office of the Judge Advocate General when their tenure in office expired.  And they solved this dilemma by adding the following amendments, detailed in that same "Congressional Globe":

   Congressman Jenks:  I move to amend Section 3 by inserting the word "naval" before the words "Judge Advocate General".

The amendment was agreed to and later Congressman Finkelburg stated:

   I would suggest the propriety of amending the third section of this Bill by inserting after the words "the Naval Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General" the words "who shall hereafter be known as Naval Solicitor".

   Mr. Jenks: I have no objection to that amendment.

This amendment was also agreed to, and the Office of the Judge Advocate General became known as the Naval Solicitor.  Thus, when the existing tenure was over, the new office would have a different set of rules and regulations so that the Bill accomplished the great purpose which it had in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government without the power of the Office of the Judge Advocate General getting in their way.
 This was a necessary step to bring the President into the position of  dictator over America. 

But they had one other problem facing them, namely, DIRECT ACCESS to the Treasury for the Department of Justice without interference.  They accomplished this by the following three sections of the Bill:

   "...The Eighth Section provides that the Attorney General is hereby empowered to make all necessary rules and regulations for the government....
   "...The Eleventh Section provides that all monies hereafter drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he may designate, and so much of the First Section of the Act, making appropriations, past March 3rd, 1859, as provides that money drawn out of  the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such dispersing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby repealed....

   "...The Fifteenth Section provides that the supervisory powers now exercised by the Secretary of the Interior over the accounts of the district attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the courts of the United States, shall be exercised by the Attorney General...."

It is important here to remember that under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the District Courts of the United States are:
   "...hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to notice and otherwise and all such orders and decrees and to issue such process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the provisions of this Act."

It is here that we find out that the district attorneys, marshals, clerks and other officers of the courts are under the Department of Justice. That seems an obvious statement, given the state of the nation today.  But the REAL PROBLEM -- given the broad scope of powers granted the District Courts under the Trading with the Enemy Act -- is that the Department of Justice is *NOT* a part of the Judicial Branch of Government!

According to Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Department of State, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Defense, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the Department of
Education, and the Department of the Veteran Affairs are *ALL* under the Executive Branch of Government.

All of the above departments are under the Executive Branch--which raises quite a few questions about the balance of powers between the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches of government.  

How can this be?  There is no balance of power under a declared state of  emergency.  And we've been living under a declared state of emergency ever since the Civil War began, and have been living under a declared state of martial law ever since the Reconstruction Act.

This overthrow of the Constitution occurred long before the War Powers Act, and if we are going back in history to find our roots of legality -- and if we stop our search when we reach the War Powers Act -- we are NOT going to succeed in this venture. 

Where is the separation of powers if the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch? Shouldn't it be part of the Judiciary?  The answer, of course, is yes; but it's not.  Again, just check Section 101 of Title 5 of  the United States Code. There is no Judiciary!

If only Congress has the power to regulate Commerce, under Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, why are the Department of Commerce and the Department of Transportation under the Executive branch and not under the Legislative branch? 

And if only the Congress has the power to coin money, according to the Constitution, why is the Department of Treasury under the Executive branch?

The Commerce Department (from Title 5):
 "...part of the Executive branch of federal government, headed by a Cabinet member, the Secretary of Commerce, which is concerned with promoting domestic and international business and commerce."
To further illustrate the take-over by the Executive branch of government via martial law rule, the following offices, bureaus, divisions, and organizations are under the Department of Justice.  And remember, the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch -- NOT under the judicial branch.

The Office of Solicitor General
The Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Drug Enforcement Agency  
The Bureau of Prisons
Immigration and Naturalization
United States Marshal Service
Office of Justice Program
United States Parole Commission
United States National Central Bureau
The Office of the Pardon Attorney
Executive Office of the United States Attorney
Criminal Division
Civil Division
Anti-Trust Division
Civil Rights Division
Tax Division
Environmental and Natural Resource Division
Community Relations Services
Foreign Claim Settlement Division
Executive Office of United States Trustees
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Justice Management Division
Office of Legal Counsel
Office of Policy Development
Office of Legislative Affairs
Office of Public Affairs
Office of Liaison Services
Office of Intelligence and Policy Review
Office of International Affairs
Office of the Inspector General
Office of Professional Responsibility; and     
Interpol -- (Note: Interpol is a private corporation, yet it comes under (in this country) the Executive branch of government.)

In my opinion:  if the matter of the repeal of the Reconstruction Act and the old H.R. 1328 are not addressed, we will remain in a state of declared martial law. But  few people do any research anymore, and even fewer read the results of  research done by others.  Yes, we are already, and have been all our lives, living under declared martial law.


The source of this law is from 1875. 

‑CITE‑  2 USC Sec. 118

‑EXPCITE‑
    TITLE 2
    CHAPTER 4

‑HEAD‑
    Sec. 118. Actions against officers for official acts
‑STATUTE‑
      In any action brought against any person for or on account of anything done by him while an officer of either House of Congress in the discharge of his official duty, in executing any order of such House, the United States attorney for the district within  which the action is brought, on being thereto requested by the officer sued, shall enter an appearance in behalf of such officer; and all provisions of the eighth section of the Act of July 28,  1866, entitled 'An Act to protect the revenue, and for other purposes', and also all provisions of the sections of former Acts  therein referred to, so far as the same relate to the removal of suits, the withholding of executions, and the paying of judgments against revenue or other officers of the United States, shall become applicable to such action and to all proceedings and matters whatsoever connected therewith, and the defense of such action shall thenceforth be conducted under the supervision and direction of the Attorney General.
‑SOURCE‑
    (Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, Sec. 8, 18 Stat. 401; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 1, 62 Stat. 909.)

‑REFTEXT‑REFERENCES IN TEXT
      The provisions of section 8 of act July 28, 1866, ch. 298, 14 Stat. 329, referred to in text, were contained generally in R.S.Sec. 643, which was incorporated in the former Judicial Code, Sec. 33, and was repealed by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 39, 62 Stat. 992. See sections 1442, 1446, and 1447 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Other provisions referred to were contained in R.S. Sec. 771, 989, which were also repealed by act June 25, 1948. See sections 509, 547, and 2006, respectively, of Title 28.

‑CHANGE‑
      CHANGE OF NAME
      Act June 25, 1948, eff.  Sept. 1, 1948, substituted 'United States attorney' for 'district attorney'.  See section 541 of Title
    28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

‑CROSS‑
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
      Judgment against certain public officers, satisfaction of, see Rule 69, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

‑SECREF‑
  SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
     
This section is referred to in section 118a of this title.
‑END‑
Statutes Relating to Commissions, Appointments, etc.

Sections in this file relate to required commissions, oaths, etc., for officers and employees of United States government and the government of the District of Columbia. All sections have been pasted directly from the 1996 CD-ROM edition of the United States Code produced and distributed by the Government Printing Office. Notes in Italics that follow the sections list regulations for each section listed in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules. It is significant that the “Seal of the United States” is no longer affixed to commissions of “judicial officers” appointed by the President with advice and consent of the Senate; commissions are filed with the Department of Justice under the D.O.J. seal, which is an executive seal. This is suggestive that there are no longer any Article III[constitutional] judges in the United States.

-CITE-
     4 USC Sec. 41                                               01/16/96
HERE’S THER REAL KICKER   
THIS IS WHAT ENSLAVES US AS 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS

The Insurrection Act (enacted in 1807) delegates authority to the President to federalize and deploy the National Guard domestically during an insurrection or civil disturbance (10 U.S.C. Sections 331-335).  Section 331 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to suppress an insurrection at the request of a state government.  Section 332 authorizes the President to use armed forces in such manner as he deems necessary to enforce the laws or suppress a rebellion.  Section 333 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to protect individuals from unlawful actions that obstruct the execution of federal laws or which impede the course of justice under federal laws.  Section 333 was enacted to implement the Fourteenth Amendment and does not require the request or consent of the governor of the affected state. 
          

Martial Law by Executive Order

 President Obama's National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order of March 16 does to the country as a whole what the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act did to the Constitution in particular -- completely eviscerates any due process or judicial oversight for any action by the Government deemed in the interest of "national security." Like the NDAA, the new Executive Order puts the government completely above the law, which, in a democracy, is never supposed to happen. The United States is essentially now under martial law without the exigencies of a national emergency.

Even as the 2012 NDAA was rooted in the Patriot Act and the various executive orders and Congressional bills that ensued to broaden executive power in the "war on terror," so the new Executive Order is rooted in the Defense Production Act of 1950 which gave the Government powers to mobilize national resources in the event of national emergencies, except now virtually every aspect of American life falls under ultimate unchallengeable government control, to be exercised by the president and his secretaries at their discretion.
The 2012 NDAA deemed the United States a "battlefield," as Senator Lindsey Graham put it, and gave the president and his agents the right to seize and arrest any U.S. citizen, detain them indefinitely without charge or trial, and do so only on suspicion, without any judicial oversight or due process. The new Executive Order states that the president and his secretaries have the authority to commandeer all U.S. domestic resources, including food and water, as well as seize all energy and transportation infrastructure inside the borders of the United States. The Government can also forcibly draft U.S. citizens into the military and force U.S. citizens to fulfill "labor requirements" for the purposes of "national defense." There is not even any Congressional oversight allowed, only briefings.
In the NDAA, only the president had the authority to abrogate legitimate freedoms of U.S. citizens. What is extraordinary in the new Executive Order is that this supreme power is designated through the president to the secretaries that run the Government itself:
• The Secretary of Defense has power over all water resources;
• The Secretary of Commerce has power over all material services and facilities, including construction materials;
• The Secretary of Transportation has power over all forms of civilian transportation;
• The Secretary of Agriculture has power over food resources and facilities, livestock plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment;
• The Secretary of Health and Human Services has power over all health resources;
• The Secretary of Energy has power over all forms of energy.
The Executive Order even stipulates that in the event of conflict between the secretaries in using these powers, the president will determine the resolution through his national security team.
The 2012 NDAA gave the Government the right to abrogate any due process against a U.S. citizen. The new Executive Order gives the government, through the Secretary of Labor, the right to proactively mobilize U.S. citizens for "labor" as the government deems necessary and to coordinate with the Secretary of Defense to maintain data to coordinate the nation's work needs in relation to national defense.
What is extraordinary about the Executive Order is that, like the NDAA, this can all be done in peacetime without any national emergency to justify it. The language of the Order does not state that all these extraordinary measures will be done in the event of "national security" or a "national emergency." They can simply be done for "purposes of national defense," clearly a broader remit that allows the government to do what it wants, when it wants, how it wants, to whomever it wants, all without any judicial restraint or due process. As Orwell famously said in 1984, "War is peace. Peace is war." This is now the reality on the ground in America.
Finally, the 2012 NDAA was hurried through the House and Senate almost like a covert op with minimal public attention or debate. It was then signed by the president at 9:00 PM on New Year's Eve while virtually nobody was paying attention to much other than the approaching new year. This new Executive Order was written and signed in complete secret and then quietly released by the White House on its website without comment. All this was done under a president who studied constitutional law at Harvard.
It is hard to know what to say in the face of such egregious disregard for the integrity of what America has stood and fought for since its founding. It is hard in part because none of us thought such encroachments would ever happen here, certainly not under the watch of a "progressive" like Obama.
At one level, the prospect for war with Iran is probably an immediate justification. But the comprehensiveness of the Executive Order, like that of the 2012 NDAA, speaks to something much deeper, more sinister. I would suggest that this Order, like the NDAA, has been in the works for some time and is simply the next step in the logic of the "global war on terror." Our political elites have come to consider democracy an impediment to effective governance and they are slowly and painstakingly creating all the democratic legalities necessary to abridge our democratic rights with impunity, all to ensure our "security." Of such measures do republics fall and by such measures tyrants emerge.
The only thing that really remains is the occasion to test the new rules of the game. Perhaps that will be war with Iran, perhaps some contrived emergency, or perhaps, as long as the public and media remain asleep, no occasion will be necessary at all. It will just slowly happen of its own accord and we, like the frog in the pot of slowly boiling water, will just sit there and be consumed by our own turpitude.


Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
What is the Federal Emergency Management Agency? Simply put, it is the "secret government". This agency has powers and authority that go well beyond any other agency in the nation. What can FEMA do? It can suspend laws. It can move entire populations. It can arrest and detain citizens without a warrant and can hold them without a trial. It can seize property, food supplies, and transportation systems. And it can even suspend the Constitution of the United States. 
When the first concept had been  presented, its original mission was to assure the survivability of the United States Government in the event of a nuclear attack. It's secondary function was to be a Federal coordinating body during times of domestic disasters. These disasters consisted of earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes. 
The "secret" black helicopters that are reported throughout the US, mainly in the West California, Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and Colorado areas are flown by FEMA personnel. It has been given the responsibility for many new national disasters such as forest fires, home heating emergencies, refugee situations, riots, and emergency planning for nuclear and toxic incidents. It works together with the Sixth Army in the West.
A series of Executive Orders (EO) was used to create FEMA. It does not matter whether an EO is Constitutional or not, it becomes a law simply by being published in the Federal Registry. These orders go around Congress.

Civilian Inmate Program - US Army Regulation 210_35
 
A coup de tas has occurred in the United States with the Military - Industrial - Complex overthrowing and taking absolute control over all 3 Branches of the Government.
More specifically, the Departmetn of Homeland security is not what most people think it is.  This is clear in the simple fact that the Department of Homeland Security was initially going to be called the Department of Homeland "Defense" and not Homeland "Security."  This clearly is a good indicator to what was on the minds of those who moved to create the Department of Homeland Security.  Beyond this you can look to other information and changes that have been carried out to get a very good indication of what is going on behind the scenes.
A perfect example is the "United States Coast Guard" and how it is now declaring itself to be a "Special Branch of the Military" not within the Department of Defense as controlled by all of the various Civilian Secretaries and the Pentagon, but somehow operating under MILITARY LAW within the Department of Homeland Security.  This is huge in and of itself , but there is so, so much more than just this.  Effectively the "United States" has created by defect or default, another "Department of Defense" without naming it as was originalyl intended.  Remember our "Department of Defense" used to be called the "Department of War," and with what is going on it is clear that the powers and people behind this sought to reconfigure the Department of Defense back into a Department of War.  Not toward "Defense", but toward preemptive and aggressive wars in contrast to our own traditions, without any proper declaration of war by Congress and to upend the International Conventions in the form of the Geneva Conventions that have helped maintain some greater level of "peace" than might have ben seen without these accords.  The Geneva Conventions decreed that all "wars of aggression" would be illegal and would be and should be considered as crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and in fact war crimes whcih by Internaional standards were to be considered some of the most heinous crimes imaginable.
There is a difference between "martial law"; "military law"; or "military dictatorship"; and normal "civil" order.  Martial law is fleeting for just a few days, maybe a few weeks and is only intended to restore civil order and to help get the courts, police, fire department and other Public Works programs back up and running.  A pretty good primer on "Martial Law" as written by Dr. Edwin Veira can be found here; 

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin198.htm
Although I would have to qualify certain things in this article it is a very good foundation on some of the aspects of Martial Law and how the usurpation by Military Forces of "civilian affairs" was even laid out wihin our Declaration of Independence as cited in Dr. Veira's article as follows;
"Patriotic Americans in the late 1700s thought no better of “martial law”. Here, the Declaration of Independence provides compelling evidence. As the Declaration recounted:
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.—

* * * * *
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.—

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:—

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:—
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States[.]
In this litany of the most egregious aspects of “martial law”, the worst is that “He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power”—for , if that can be done, then all the rest (and even more) will inevitably follow, inasmuch as no one will have any legal recourse against whatever the executors of “martial law” may choose to do."
That is exactly where I find myself today in my own and present predicament that I have endured for at least the past 7 years now.  This is also the key reason why I have gone to great lengths to warn and inform others about what is going on within the U.S. Coast Guard and Homeland Security as it is un-American and as foreign to our lands and our people and our ways as were the Hessen Mercenaries the Royal families of the "United Kingdoms" hired to quell the rebellion in the original 13 colonies that evolved into and became the "United States of America."


The US is now under Martial Law without the justification of a Civil Uprising, Natural Disaster or National Emergency.  


Obama's National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order does to the US what the Patriot Act and the NDAA did to the Constitution.

President Barack Obama's new National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order, of March 16 does to the country what the 2001 Patriot Act and 2012 National Defense Authorization Act did to our Constitution's Bill of Rights, by completely disemboweling any due process or judicial oversight for any action by the federal government. 

As usual, the Executive Order was signed in secret, out from under the radar of mainstream media and as usual, when leaders pass something they know to be wrong, they deem it in the interest of "national security."

The NDAA had been hurried through the House and Senate, then signed by the President Obama at 9:00 PM on New Year's Eve, while nobody was paying any attention to much other than their New Years Eve party. This new National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order, was both written and signed in total secrecy, then quietly released by the White House on its website without comment, reason or justification.

As of the Executive Order, aka National Defense Resources Preparedness, the United States government can arrest you and take away your constitutional rights any time it wants to! Over the last couple of decades, there has been an endless parade of laws, bills and executive orders that have been slowly but surly taking our rights guaranteed to us under the Bill of Rights.

With all of this happening in secret and out of the mainstream headlines, most Americans are not even aware this is happening.

Like the Patriot act and National Defense Authorization Act, aka the NDAA, the new Executive Order puts the government entirely above the law. In other words, the United States is unofficially, but practically under martial law right now, without even the necessity of a national emergency.
"Even as the 2012 NDAA was rooted in the Patriot Act and the various executive orders and Congressional bills that ensued to broaden executive power in the "war on terror," so the new Executive Order is rooted in the Defense Production Act of 1950 which gave the Government powers to mobilize national resources in the event of national emergencies, except now virtually every aspect of American life falls under ultimate unchallengeable government control, to be exercised by the president and his secretaries at their discretion," wrote Jim Garrison, President of Wisdom University and author of 'America as Empire' in his Huffington Post article, Martial Law by Executive Order

According to the NDAA, as it was updated in 2012, the United States is a "battlefield," and the president and his agents have the right only on suspicion, without any judicial oversight or due process, to seize and arrest any US citizen and detain them indefinitely without charge or trial. Now, the new Executive Order gives the president and his secretaries the additional authority to commandeer all US domestic resources, including food and water, energy and transportation inside the borders of the United States. It goes even further, granting the Government the power to forcibly draft US citizens into the military and force US citizens to fulfill "labor requirements" for the purposes of "national defense." It goes so far as to not even allow any Congressional oversight, only briefings.

Under the NDAA, only the president had the authority to expunge legitimate freedoms of US citizens, whereas under the new Executive Order this supreme power is delegated by the president to his secretaries which actually run the Government:
  • The Secretary of Defense has power over all water resources
  • The Secretary of Commerce has power over all material services and facilities
  • The Secretary of Transportation has power over all forms of civilian transportation
  • The Secretary of Agriculture has power over food resources and facilities, including livestock resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment
  • The Secretary of Energy has power over all forms of energy
  • The Secretary of Health and Human Services has power over all health resources
The National Defense Resources Preparedness even stipulates that in the event of conflict between the secretaries in using these powers, the president will determine the resolution through his national security team.

The new Executive Order gives the government, through the Secretary of Labor, the right to proactively mobilize US citizens for "labor" as the government deems necessary to the nation's work needs in relation to national defense. Yes, this means what you think it means. US citizens can now be used as forced slave labor by the government!

The National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645 mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations all across the United States, supposedly for “temporary housing, medical care and humanitarian assistance in case of emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill. However, it is well documented that these centers will serve as Nazi style "concentration camps" for detaining people the government sees as a threat to their authority.

When Ron Paul was asked for his opinion on whether H.R. 645 (The National Emergency Centers Establishment Act) could lead to Americans being incarcerated in detention camps during a time of martial law.

Paul responded: “Yeah, that’s their goal, they’re setting up the stage for violence in this country, no doubt about it.”

What makes the new Executive Order so dangerous, is that unlike like the NDAA and other previous bills, this can all be done in peacetime without any national emergency to justify it. The language of the Order does not state that all these extraordinary measures will be done for "national security" or in case of a "national emergency." They can simply be done for "national defense," in a much a broader definition, allowing the government, primarily under authorization of the president, to do what it wants, how it wants, when it wants, to whomever it wants without any judicial restrictions or due process.  

It also seems suspicious, that just as activists and NDAA opposing politicians start making headway in getting the NDAA repealed or at least suspended, they pass this new Executive Order.

The new Executive Order, the NDAA and the Patriot Act are without a doubt part of something much bigger, more sinister and evil. They are all parts of a larger plan forged by the elitists long ago. We are but pawns in their global game of chess.

What can I say about such disregard for the integrity of what America stands for by a president who studied constitutional law at Harvard? That I will continue my investigation of the man? That I will continue to expose him as the fraud he is? What else can I do?

I am surely already on our government's watchlists, making me one of the first targets when the hammer falls. I am already risking my freedom, well-being even my life for bringing you this information. To our government, along with people like Alex Jones, David Icke and the late Milton William Cooper (who was murdered by the FBI), I am a threat to "national security" and in their way of establishing the New World Order.
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Don't Troll, if you can't add anything helpful, don't post.