Despite a history of the criticism of water fluoridation being characterized as “scare mongering via crazy water fluoridation conspiracy theories,” a study conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and China Medical University
in Shenyang, combining 27 other studies, “found strong indications that
fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children.”
Hilariously, some actually go as far as to claim, “almost all health and dental
organizations support the fluoridation of water or have found no
association with adverse effects with water fluoridation,” which is clearly untrue.
The study, which was actually a systematic review of other studies, was published on July 20, 2012 in Environmental Health Perspectives and mostly relied on research from China.
The researchers focused on fluoride’s interaction with the developing
human brain since public health experts have so far been unable to come
to a consensus on the safety of fluoridated drinking water consumption
in children.
However, it has been established that “extremely high levels” of
fluoride cause neurotoxicity in adults. Furthermore, negative impacts on
learning and memory have been found in rodent studies, much like high-fructose corn syrup.
While proponents of water fluoridation regularly like to claim that
there is plenty of science backing up the practice, according to Anna
Choi, lead author of the study and research scientist in the Department
of Environmental Health at HSPH, “Virtually no human studies in this
field have been conducted in the U.S.”
Therefore, the researchers relied on Chinese studies since, according to HSPH’s press release, “exposures to the chemical are increased in some parts of China,” and the risks of fluoride have been well documented there.
Yet the researchers had to contend with the fact that some of the
studies on children in China differed in various ways or were
incomplete. This forced the authors to take care in data compilation and
analysis in order to properly assess the potential risk of fluoride
use.
“For the first time we have been able to do a comprehensive
meta-analysis that has the potential for helping us plan better
studies,” said Choi. “We want to make sure that cognitive development is
considered as a possible target for fluoride toxicity.”
While the studies might have had some difficulties, the conclusions
drawn by Choi and senior author and adjunct professor of environmental
health at HSPH, Philippe Grandjean, seem to be quite clear.
Grandjean and Choi collated the various epidemiological studies of
children who had been exposed to fluoridated drinking water and the
China National Knowledge Infrastructure was also leveraged to find
studies published in Chinese journals.
The authors then analyzed the relationship between fluoride exposure and IQ measures in over 8,000 children age 14 and below.
They discovered that in every study but one, highly fluoridated drinking water was linked to problems in cognitive development.
That being said, the average loss was not as significant as some
might expect. Averaged out, the loss was only half of a single IQ point,
yet some studies indicated that even a slight increase in fluoride
exposure could indeed be toxic to the brain.
The researchers further observed that children raised in areas with
high fluoride content did, in fact, have significantly lower IQ scores
than children who lived in areas with low fluoride.
The authors believe that the toxic effects of fluoride on brain
development may have occurred long before the time the children were
studied and that the brain may not be able to fully compensate for the
toxic effects.
“Fluoride seems to fit in with lead, mercury, and other poisons that
cause chemical brain drain,” Grandjean says. “The effect of each
toxicant may seem small, but the combined damage on a population scale
can be serious, especially because the brain power of the next
generation is crucial to all of us.”
Personally, I find these statements to be nothing short of
astounding. Usually we see fluoride being supported and touted,
especially when discussing water fluoridation. These researchers,
however, are presenting a much different picture, highlighting the fact
that the cumulative damage of all of these toxicants is much more
serious than some may want us to believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't Troll, if you can't add anything helpful, don't post.