http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/10/29/conspiracy-theorists-say-obama-engineered-hurricane-sandy
HAARP, a research program managed by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy, studies and conducts experiments relating to the ionosphere, or upper atmosphere. As NASA explains on its web site, the ionosphere is important because it often reflects radio waves and scatters GPS signals, leading to "a big impact on communications and navigation" on Earth.
Because of this, conspiracy theorists have blamed HAARP for a number of natural events over the years, saying the government uses the Alaska-based program to manipulate the weather with the help of electromagnetic waves.
HAARP: All the proof in the world!
For anyone still “on the fence” about weather modification / manipulation :
All links below should satisfy MOST questions: Save the pdf’s before they’re gone for good from the net!
HAARP patent:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26517997/Us-Patent-Harrp-5041834#fullscreen:on
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4686605.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4712155.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5038664.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4686605.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4712155.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5038664.pdf
Download the Airforce “owning the weather by 2025 document from the military website here:
US laws regarding weather modification:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/12896975/US-Law-Weather-Modification-Experimenting
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/15C9A.txt
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/15C9A.txt
More military sites covering HAARP:
http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=21914
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA134923
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA134923
US Navy involved: http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=1610
Seeding the clouds to make it snow:
Weather modification COMPANIES in operation today inside the USA:
http://www.wtwma.com
http://www.weathermodification.com
http://www.naiwmc.org/
http://www.just-clouds.com/
http://www.wtwma.com
http://www.weathermodification.com
http://www.naiwmc.org/
http://www.just-clouds.com/
Example of the HAARP RING anomalies we’ve been witnessing:
Senate Bill S.601 – weather ‘mitigation’ bill – Sponsored by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Rockefeller
(did NOT pass in its current form) instead it was put to the Air force “Owning the weather 2025″ program :
Here is the “weather mitigation bill” co-sponsored in congress:S. 601: Weather Mitigation Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2009
The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress. GovTrack did not write and has no control over these summaries.
7/22/2009–Reported to Senate amended. Weather Mitigation Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2009 -
Section 5 – Establishes in the Geosciences Directorate of the National Science Foundation (NSF) the Weather Mitigation Research Office to establish and coordinate the national research and development program on weather mitigation described in this Act. Requires the Program to be headed by a Director, who shall be appointed by the Director of the Geosciences Directorate. Instructs the Director of the NSF to coordinate the work of the Program with the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Authorizes the Director of the Program to: (1) fund studies, obtain information, and hold workshops necessary to carry out this Act; (2) cooperate with public or private agencies to promote the purposes of this Act; and (3) enter into cooperative agreements with the head of a U.S. department or agency, an appropriate official of a state or political subdivision of a state, or an appropriate official of a private or public agency or organization to conduct research and development (R&D) pertaining to weather mitigation. Creates a Working Group to advise the Program and to make recommendations to the Program concerning administration, research, and other matters.
Section 5 – Establishes in the Geosciences Directorate of the National Science Foundation (NSF) the Weather Mitigation Research Office to establish and coordinate the national research and development program on weather mitigation described in this Act. Requires the Program to be headed by a Director, who shall be appointed by the Director of the Geosciences Directorate. Instructs the Director of the NSF to coordinate the work of the Program with the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Authorizes the Director of the Program to: (1) fund studies, obtain information, and hold workshops necessary to carry out this Act; (2) cooperate with public or private agencies to promote the purposes of this Act; and (3) enter into cooperative agreements with the head of a U.S. department or agency, an appropriate official of a state or political subdivision of a state, or an appropriate official of a private or public agency or organization to conduct research and development (R&D) pertaining to weather mitigation. Creates a Working Group to advise the Program and to make recommendations to the Program concerning administration, research, and other matters.
Section 6 – Requires the Director of the Program, in consultation with the Working Group, to submit an implementation plan to Congress for the establishment and coordination of the Program. Permits the inclusion in the Program of specified activities related to weather mitigation, including: (1) interdisciplinary R&D and coordination of R&D and activities to improve the understanding of processes relating to planned and inadvertent weather mitigation; (2) coordination with relevant organizations; (3) development, through partnerships among federal agencies, state agencies, and academic institutions, of new technologies and approaches for weather mitigation; and (4) establishment of scholarships and educational opportunities that encourage an interdisciplinary approach to weather mitigation. Requires the Program to promote and fund R&D, studies, and investigations with respect to: (1) improved forecast and decisionmaking technologies for weather mitigation operations; and (2) adaptation and scaling experiments in the efficacy of weather mitigation. Authorizes the Director of the NSF to establish a grant program for the awarding of grants to eligible entities (state agencies, institutions of higher education, and nonprofits that have expertise in the field of weather mitigation and experience working with state agencies) for R&D projects that pertain to weather mitigation.
Section 7 – Requires the Director to submit biennial reports containing certain information to the President and specified congressional committees.
Section 8 – Instructs the head of any U.S. department or agency and the head of any other public or private institution receiving research funds from the United States to cooperate with the Director of the Program.
Section 9 – Directs the OSTP, in support of the implementation plan, to: (1) address relevant programs and activities of the federal agencies and departments that would contribute to the Program; (2) consider and use, as appropriate, reports and studies of federal agencies and departments, weather modification organizations, and other expert scientific bodies, including a specified National Research Council report; and (3) make recommendations for the coordination of Program activities with weather mitigation activities of other national and international organizations. Requires OSTP, in the support of the biennial reports required from the Director under section 7, to provide specified information.
Section 10 – Authorizes appropriations. Allows for the acceptance, use, and disposal of gifts or donations of services or property under the Program.”
Section 7 – Requires the Director to submit biennial reports containing certain information to the President and specified congressional committees.
Section 8 – Instructs the head of any U.S. department or agency and the head of any other public or private institution receiving research funds from the United States to cooperate with the Director of the Program.
Section 9 – Directs the OSTP, in support of the implementation plan, to: (1) address relevant programs and activities of the federal agencies and departments that would contribute to the Program; (2) consider and use, as appropriate, reports and studies of federal agencies and departments, weather modification organizations, and other expert scientific bodies, including a specified National Research Council report; and (3) make recommendations for the coordination of Program activities with weather mitigation activities of other national and international organizations. Requires OSTP, in the support of the biennial reports required from the Director under section 7, to provide specified information.
Section 10 – Authorizes appropriations. Allows for the acceptance, use, and disposal of gifts or donations of services or property under the Program.”
Here is a very long list of links, pdf files from institutions like stanford, leicester university, cornell, University of Mass., etc.. and from several military and .gov sites.
They are easy to read.. yes there is a lot of math formula but if you skip over the gobbledygook you can read the thesis etc, and get a VERY good idea of the topic and what is being covered.
Even the lay person can understand these documents in their basic form.
Some links work, others are “down” but still included to prove they DID exist. These things have a way of disappearing off the net, so download them and MIRROR them on other file sharing sites if you can.
*******************************************
University of Leicester — Ionospheric Heating
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980211033937/http://ion.le.ac.uk/index.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980211032156/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/Heating.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980211032156/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/Heating.html
Precipitation “enhancement”
Defense Secretary from the 1990′s William Cohen speaking on the subject of HAARP –
The USGS EAARL:
Ocean based haarp Buoy:
Electronic warfare :
Lower ionosphere heating:
AWESOME network:
http://nova.stanford.edu/~vlf/IHY_Test/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Transmitters.Transmitters
(several years up to 2007)
http://vlf-alexandria.stanford.edu/live_spec_secure/chistochina/live_from_chistochina.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20061229014910/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/history_of_rf_heating.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20061229011401/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/6Feb.html
http://nova.stanford.edu/~vlf/IHY_Test/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Transmitters.Transmitters
(several years up to 2007)
http://vlf-alexandria.stanford.edu/live_spec_secure/chistochina/live_from_chistochina.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20061229014910/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/history_of_rf_heating.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20061229011401/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/6Feb.html
Sura Ionospheric Heating Facility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sura_Ionospheric_Heating_Facility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sura_Ionospheric_Heating_Facility
The EISCAT Associates
(A lot of info on this site, captured from the late 90′s)
(A lot of info on this site, captured from the late 90′s)
France, Finland, Germany, Japan, Norway, Sweden, UK
*Incoherent scatter radars
(Below)
*Incoherent scatter radars
(Below)
*Ionospheric Heating
Their Facility -
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980210071758/http://seldon.eiscat.no/heater.html
Their Facility -
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980210071758/http://seldon.eiscat.no/heater.html
Arecibo, Puerto Rico
replay.waybackmachine.org/19961105195521/http:/naic.edu/
(click on a Layman’s guide for info on “probing the ionosphere” and “modifiying the ionosphere locally”
Millstone Hill, USA
(Haystack)
LINK`http`replay.waybackmachine.org/19970710073509/www.haystack.edu/homepage.html`replay.waybackmachine.org/19970710073509/LINK
replay.waybackmachine.org/19961105195521/http:/naic.edu/
(click on a Layman’s guide for info on “probing the ionosphere” and “modifiying the ionosphere locally”
Millstone Hill, USA
(Haystack)
LINK`http`replay.waybackmachine.org/19970710073509/www.haystack.edu/homepage.html`replay.waybackmachine.org/19970710073509/LINK
Pic of Haystack facility and more info:
LINK`http`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990116225557/www.haystack.edu/haystack/haystack.html`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990116225557/LINK
LINK`http`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990116225557/www.haystack.edu/haystack/haystack.html`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990116225557/LINK
Sondrestromfjord, Greenland
LINK`http`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990224220742/128.18.44.75/iono/issfsond.html`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990224220742/LINK
LINK`http`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990224220742/128.18.44.75/iono/issfsond.html`replay.waybackmachine.org/19990224220742/LINK
EISCAT, Norway/Sweden/Finland
(Main EISCAT Site)
EISCAT Svalbard Radar, Svalbard (First operations late in 1995)
(Main EISCAT Site)
EISCAT Svalbard Radar, Svalbard (First operations late in 1995)
Kharkov, Ukraine
www-radiophys.univer.kharkov.ua/space/
www-radiophys.univer.kharkov.ua/space/
(search for scatter)
Irkutsk, Russia
The Institute possesses a complex of unique astrophysical equipment deployed in the Sayan Mountains, especially the Siberian solar radiotelescope, a large solar vacuum telescope, an incoherent scatter radar, as well as a network of astrophysical laboratories throughout the territory of Siberia.
The Institute possesses a complex of unique astrophysical equipment deployed in the Sayan Mountains, especially the Siberian solar radiotelescope, a large solar vacuum telescope, an incoherent scatter radar, as well as a network of astrophysical laboratories throughout the territory of Siberia.
www.irkutsk.org/acad/acad_e.htm/ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA05/pdf/GP2.3%280511%29.pdf
MU, Japan
————————————-
USA (Besides HAARP)
UCLA’s
HIPAS — High Power Aural Stimulation Observatory
Located near Fairbanks Alaska
USA (Besides HAARP)
UCLA’s
HIPAS — High Power Aural Stimulation Observatory
Located near Fairbanks Alaska
ulcar.uml.edu/stationmap.html
ulcar.uml.edu/stationlist.html
ulcar.uml.edu/stationlist.html
159.226.23.71/carbon.ucdenver.edu/~mgolkows/Publications/RF2010.pdf
deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/21659
www.polar.umd.edu/haarp/riometer_paper/node3.html#SECTION00030000000000000000
www.polar.umd.edu/haarp/riometer_paper/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000
CERN and HAARP –
cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1305357
cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1305357
arxiv.org/pdf/1011.1458.pdf
cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1003294/files/0612038.pdf
arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0101034
books.google.com/books?id=wUoEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=Irving+Langmuir+rainmaker&source=bl&ots=Ehqq8hZNsE&sig=tkN51NoxqMsKVq6ClZU9Hvej8g0&hl=en&ei=9mhMTO3vG93llQfjpJHGDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false
books.google.com/books?id=FVMEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA113&dq=Irving+Langmuir&as_pt=MAGAZINES&cd=1#v=onepage&q=Irving%20Langmuir&f=false
books.google.com/books?id=G7t260XD8AYC&pg=PA47&dq=stormfury&hl=en&ei=9wJOTOfVE4G88gbZ3IGaDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=stormfury&f=false
Simulations of ELF radiation generated by heating the high-latitude D- region
H.L. Rowland, Beam Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
H.L. Rowland, Beam Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
“This ionospheric modification technique can provide such waves for probing both the Earth and the ionosphere- magnetosphere.”
HAARP JOINT SERVICES PROGRAM PLANS AND ACTIVITIES: Air Force Geophysics Laboratory and Office of Naval Research, February 1990 (PDF)
Link obtained from:
Popular Mechanics Magazine:
The World’s 18 Strangest Military Bases
The World’s 18 Strangest Military Bases
HAARP Research Station – not much info, but says:
“In past interviews, HAARP’s operators readily admit they’re researching potential defense applications.”
——————————-
——————————-
Modification of the Ionosphere by VLF Wave-Induced Electron Precipitation
vlf.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Doolittle%20PhD%20Dissertation.pdf
——————————–
——————————–
Title : A Diagnostic System for Studying Energy Partitioning and Assessing the Response of the Ionosphere During HAARP Modification Experiments.
“The HAARP facility is classically referred to as an HF ionospheric modification facility. HF ionospheric modification entails the use of high power, high-frequency (~2-15MHZ) radio waves to modify the earth’s ionosphere.”
—————————————————
Title : High-Energy Electron Beam-Induced Ionospheric Modification Experiments
Title : High-Energy Electron Beam-Induced Ionospheric Modification Experiments
List Found here
ulcar.uml.edu/stationlist.html
DIDBase list here
DIDBase list here
car.uml.edu/common/DIDBFastStationList
ulcar.uml.edu/DIDBase
Much more can be found
giro.uml.edu/
alum.mit.edu/news/WhatMatters/Archive/200906/
Armstrong, R., Glenn G.J., Alamaro, M. “Coordination, research needed in weather science”, Physics Today, Vol 60, Page 10, June 2007.
Alamaro, M., Emanuel, KA, McGillis, W.: “Experimental Investigation of Air-Sea Transfers at High Wind Speed,” forthcoming in Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
With Emanuel, K.A.: “Sea-Air Transfer in Tropical Cyclones,” Proceedings of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Sapora, Japan, July 1, 2003.
Popular Press:
“Riders on The Storm”, The Atlantic Monthly, October 2007.
“Scientists a step closer to steering hurricanes-schematics “, The Sunday Telegraph, October 21, 2007.
web.mit.edu/alamaro/www/telegraph_hurricane_rendering_oct_21_2007.pdf
“Scientists a step closer to steering hurricanes”, The Sunday Telegraph, October 21, 2007.
“Rising Drug Costs Prompt New Uses for Old Pills”, Nature Medicine, Nature Magazine, Volume 12 P. 1333, December 2006
alamaro.home.comcast.net/~alamaro/Nature_Dec_2006.pdf
“Old Pills Finding New Medicine Cabinets”, The New York Times, May 18, 2005.
alamaro.home.comcast.net/~alamaro/New_York_Times_May_18_2005.htm
“Scientists: Killer Hurricanes May Someday Be Controlled With Soot”, Fox News, October 31, 2007.
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,306201,00.html
“Activate Cloud Shield! Zap a Twister!”, Weird Magazine, January 2000.
www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/site/pics/katrina/weather_pr.html
“Ultra-thin ‘blankets’ cut reservoir evaporation”, New Scientist, November 2003
www.newscientist.com/article/dn4323-ultrathin-blankets-cut-reservoir-evaporation.html
www.news.com.au/weird-true-freaky/bueau-of-mereology-cant-explain-mysterious-patters-on-radar-system/story-e6frflri-1225848774377
This link below shows interesting cycle of test patterns repeating series of varying arrays
catastrophist.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/aust-radar-rings-haarp/
Feel free to pass them to your networking site admins to host.. i have not yet registered on your site (
z15.invisionfree.com/patrioticspace/index.php
ELF – www.mediafire.com/?579i63yq53u1q
Tesla Technology – www.mediafire.com/?7xn1eqog9b5au
Science & Engineering – www.mediafire.com/?gs2scvvhz6ww8
lligatorfarm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/smoking-gun-haarp/
i116.photobucket.com/albums/o26/squiresmurf/rad_us_loop.gif
www.spaceweather.ac.cn/page.php?title=meriproject
i116.photobucket.com/albums/o26/squiresmurf/rad_us_loop.gif
www.spaceweather.ac.cn/page.php?title=meriproject
(translate with google)
english.cssar.cas.cn/op/mp/
TERMINATED for THIS video (Shows Weather Modification Patents):
http://youtu.be/-EDJulwIaFY
Link to Dutchsinse Explanation of Patents & the 2 Patents he mentions:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/?08z6my9m9e1d773
http://www.mediafire.com/view/?d2xzc6cda61p141
Much more on Weather Mod here:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=6489&st=0#entry22007328
NOW READ THIS OFFICIAL US AIR FORCE DOCUMENT
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
Owning the Weather in 2025
Lt Col James B. Near, Jr.
LTC William B. Shields (USA)
Maj Ronald J. Celentano
Maj David M. Husband
Maj Ann E. Mercer
Maj James E. Pugh
Disclaimer
This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.
This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared for public release.
- Introduction
- Required Capability
- System Description
- Concept of Operations
- Precipitation
- Fog
- Storms
- Exploitation of "NearSpace" for Space Control
- Opportunities Afforded by Space Weather-modification
- Communications Dominance via Ionospheric Modification
- Artificial Weather
- Concept of Operations Summary
- Investigation Recommendations
- Appendix
A Why Is the Ionosphere Important? - B Research to Better Understand and Predict Ionospheric Effects
- C Acronyms and DefinitionsBibliographyNotes
1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix
A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.
Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.
| DEGRADE ENEMY FORCES | ENHANCE FRIENDLY FORCES |
| Precipitation Enhancement | Precipitation Avoidance |
| - Flood Lines of Communication | - Maintain/Improve LOC |
| - Reduce PGM/Recce Effectiveness | - Maintain Visibility |
| - Decrease Comfort Level/Morale | - Maintain Comfort Level/Morale |
| Storm Enhancement | Storm Modification |
| - Deny Operations | - Choose Battlespace Environment |
| Precipitation Denial | Space Weather |
| - Deny Fresh Water | - Improve Communication Reliability |
| -- Induce Drought | - Intercept Enemy Transmissions |
| Space Weather | - Revitalize Space Assets |
| - Disrupt Communications/Radar | Fog and Cloud Generation |
| - Disable/Destroy Space Assets | - Increase Concealment |
| Fog and Cloud Removal | Fog and Cloud Removal |
| - Deny Concealment | - Maintain Airfield Operations |
| - Increase Vulnerability to PGM/Recce | - Enhance PGM Effectiveness |
| Detect Hostile Weather Activities | Defend against Enemy Capabilities |
In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.
In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness.1 "The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;"2 in 2025 we can "Own the Weather."
Introduction
Meteorological analysis reveals that equatorial South America typically has afternoon thunderstorms on a daily basis throughout the year. Our intelligence has confirmed that cartel pilots are reluctant to fly in or near thunderstorms. Therefore, our weather force support element (WFSE), which is a part of the commander in chief's (CINC) air operations center (AOC), is tasked to forecast storm paths and trigger or intensify thunderstorm cells over critical target areas that the enemy must defend with their aircraft. Since our aircraft in 2025 have all-weather capability, the thunderstorm threat is minimal to our forces, and we can effectively and decisively control the sky over the target.
The WFSE has the necessary sensor and communication capabilities to observe, detect, and act on weather-modification requirements to support US military objectives. These capabilities are part of an advanced battle area system that supports the war-fighting CINC. In our scenario, the CINC tasks the WFSE to conduct storm intensification and concealment operations. The WFSE models the atmospheric conditions to forecast, with 90 percent confidence, the likelihood of successful modification using airborne cloud generation and seeding.
In 2025, uninhabited aerospace vehicles (UAV) are routinely used for weather-modification operations. By cross-referencing desired attack times with wind and thunderstorm forecasts and the SPOT satellite's projected orbit, the WFSE generates mission profiles for each UAV. The WFSE guides each UAV using near-real-time information from a networked sensor array.
Prior to the attack, which is coordinated with forecasted weather conditions, the UAVs begin cloud generation and seeding operations. UAVs disperse a cirrus shield to deny enemy visual and infrared (IR) surveillance. Simultaneously, microwave heaters create localized scintillation to disrupt active sensing via synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems such as the commercially available Canadian search and rescue satellite-aided tracking (SARSAT) that will be widely available in 2025. Other cloud seeding operations cause a developing thunderstorm to intensify over the target, severely limiting the enemy's capability to defend. The WFSE monitors the entire operation in real-time and notes the successful completion of another very important but routine weather-modification mission.
This scenario may seem far-fetched, but by 2025 it is within the realm of possibility. The next chapter explores the reasons for weather-modification, defines the scope, and examines trends that will make it possible in the next 30 years.
Contact: Air Force 2025Last updated: 11 December 1996
Weather warfare
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| War |
|---|
Weather warfare is the use of weather modification techniques such as cloud seeding for military purposes.
The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (Geneva: 18 May 1977, Entered into force: 5 October 1978) prohibits "widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury".[1] However it has been argued that this permits "local, non-permanent changes".
Prior to the Geneva Convention, the United States used weather warfare in the Vietnam War. Under the auspices of the Air Weather Service, the United States' Operation Popeyeused cloud seeding over the Ho Chi Minh Trail, increasing rainfall by an estimated thirty percent during 1967 and 1968. It was hoped that the increased rainfall would reduce the rate of infiltration down the trail.[2]
With much less success, the United States also dropped salt on the airbase during the siege of Khe Sanh in an attempt to reduce the fog that hindered air operations.[citation needed]
A research paper produced for the United States Air Force written in 1996 speculates about the future use of nano-technology to produce "artificial weather", clouds of microscopic computer particle all communicating with each other to form an intelligent fog that could be used for various purposes. "Artificial weather technologies do not currently exist. But as they are developed, the importance of their potential applications rises rapidly." Weather modification technologies are described as "a force multiplier with tremendous power that could be exploited across the full spectrum of war-fighting environments." [3]
[edit]See also
[edit]References
- ^ Environmental Warfare and Climate Change Michel Chossudovsky.
- ^ Transcript of the US Senate Hearing on Weather Modification of March 20, 1974
- ^ House, Tamzy J., et al.. "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025". US Air Force. Retrieved April 17, 2012.
Air Force Aims for Weather Control
Someday the U.S. military could drive a trailer to a spot just beyond insurgent fighting and, within minutes, reconfigure part of the atmosphere, blocking an enemy’s ability to receive satellite signals, even as U.S. troops are able to see into the area with radar.
“This scenario may not be far away,” says Defense Tech pal Sharon Weinberger in this month’s edition of the always-excellent Defense Technology International.An engineer with Research Support Instruments in Princeton, N.J. recently completed the first phase of work for a U.S. Air Force sponsored project called Microwave Ionosphere Reconfiguration Ground based Emitter, or Mirage. (scroll down)
The work involves using plasma an ionized gas to reconfigure the ionosphere. Mirage would employ a microwave transmitter on the ground and a small rocket that shoots chaff into the air to produce about a liter of plasma at 60–100 km. (36– 60 mi.) in altitude, changing the number of electrons in a select area of the ionosphere to create a virtual barrier. Ionosphere reconfiguration offers two major applications of interest to the military: bouncing radars off the ionosphere, also known as over-the-horizon radar, and the ability to jam signals from the Global Positioning Satellite system, according to John Kline, the lead investigator for Mirage.
This work is only the latest effort in Kline’s more extensive investigations of atmospheric plasmas Before Mirage, Kline had another contract for a project called Plasma Point Defense, which explored the possibility of using a plasma weapon on board a U.S. Navy surface vessel to protect against threats ranging from surface-to-surface missiles to mortars and rocket-propelled grenades.
In the past, NASA’s fringe science arm has looked into tweaking Mother Nature, to throw hurricanes off their course. But those were just computer simulations. No one actually tried to go out a build some weather control machine.
http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/text/faa_confirms_chemtrails
Read more: http://defensetech.org/2006/02/08/air-force-aims-for-weather-control/#ixzz2Au9PcFEj
Defense.org
| ||||
Vandalism In The Sky
By Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane ManningTechno-Net is the protest form of the 1990s -- picketing on the information highways. For example, a fast-growing assortment of men and women around the world are using the InterNet (started by the U.S. military for information transfer-and-exchange that would never be interfered with) to draw attention to a questionable military project in Alaska. Now these InterNetting, e-mailing, faxing folks are blowing holes in the Department of Defense secrecy wall, by using the government's own system.
The printed-word part of the protest started when Dennis Specht, an anti-nuclear activist then living in Alaska, sent a news item to Nexus on the topic of HAARP --- the High frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Then an Alaskan political activist and science researcher in Anchorage, Nick Begich, networked with Patrick and Gael Crystal Flanagan, who are self-described TechnoMonks living in Sedona, Arizona, and was told to check out that same Australian-based magazine. Begich was surprised to see an item from his hometown in Nexus, and immediately headed to the local library to dig out the documents cited in the article.
That research led to articles and the book, Angels Don't Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, which is 230 pages of detailed information on this intrusive project. This article will only give highlights. Despite the amount of research (350 footnotes), at its heart it is a story about ordinary people who took on an extraordinary challenge.
HAARP Boils The Upper Atmosphere
HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric heater". (The ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between about 40- to 600 miles above Earth's surface.)
Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope; antennas send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is the test run for a super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything -- living and dead.
HAARP publicity gives the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program is mainly an academic project with the goal of changing the ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However, other U.S. military documents put it more clearly -- HAARP aims to learn how to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes". Communicating with submarines is only one of those purposes.
Press releases and other information from the military on HAARP continually downplay what it could do. Publicity documents insist that the HAARP project is no different than other ionospheric heaters operating safely throughout the world in places such as Arecibo, Puerto Rico; Tromso, Norway and the former Soviet Union. However, a 1990 government document indicates that the radio-frequency (RF) power zap will drive the ionosphere to unnatural activities.
"...at the highest HF powers available in the West, the instabilities commonly studied are approaching their maximum RF energy dissipative capability, beyond which the plasma processes will 'runaway' until the next limiting factor is reached."If the military, in cooperation with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, can show that this new ground-based "Star Wars" technology is sound, they both win. The military has a relatively-inexpensive defense shield and the University can brag about the most dramatic geophysical manipulation since atmospheric explosions of nuclear bombs. After successful testing, they would have the military megaprojects of the future and huge markets for Alaska's North Slope natural gas.
Looking at the other patents which built on the work of a Texas' physicist named Bernard Eastlund, it becomes clearer how the military intends to use the HAARP transmitter. It also makes governmental denials less believable. The military knows how it intends to use this technology, and has made it clear in their documents. The military has deliberately misled the public, through sophisticated word games, deceit and outright disinformation.
The military says the HAARP system could:
The above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in sound national defense, and to those concerned about cost-cutting. However, the possible uses which the HAARP records do not explain, and which can only be found in Air Force, Army, Navy and other federal agency records, are alarming. Moreover, effects from the reckless use of these power levels in our natural shield - the ionosphere - could be cataclysmic according to some scientists.
- give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option by the military through at least 1986).
- replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact technology.
- Be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned for the current location of HAARP, with a more flexible and accurate system.
- provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own communications systems working.
- provide a wide area earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements.
- be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over a large area.
- be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other technologies obsolete.
Two Alaskans put it bluntly. A founder of the NO HAARP movement, Clare Zickuhr, says "The military is going to give the ionosphere a big kick and see what happens."
The military failed to tell the public that they do not know what exactly will happen, but a Penn State science article brags about that uncertainty. Macho science? The HAARP project uses the largest energy levels yet played with by what Begich and Manning call "the big boys with their new toys". It is an experiment on the sky, and experiments are done to find out something not already known. Independent scientists told Begich and Manning that a HAARP-type "skybuster" with its unforeseen effects could be an act of global vandalism.
HAARP History
The patents described below were the package of ideas which were originally controlled by ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the biggest oil companies in the world. APTI was the contractor that built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold this subsidiary, the patents and the second phase construction contract to E-Systems in June 1994.
E-Systems is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world -- doing work for the CIA, defense intelligence organizations and others. $1.8 billion of their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 million for black projects -- projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told how the money is being spent.
E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, which is one of the largest defense contractors in the world. In 1994 Raytheon was listed as number forty-two on the Fortune 500 list of companies. Raytheon has thousands of patents, some of which will be valuable in the HAARP project. The twelve patents below are the backbone of the HAARP project, and are now buried among the thousands of others held in the name of Raytheon.
Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent # 4,686,605 , "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere" was sealed for a year under a government Secrecy Order.
The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different; the radio frequency (RF) radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the ionosphere. This difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter, compared to others only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.
This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the ways necessary to create futuristic effects described in the patent. According to the patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early 1900's formed the basis of the research.
What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the patents? They could make enormous profits by beaming electrical power from a powerhouse in the gas fields to the consumer without wires.
For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of the intended uses for HAARP. In April, 1995, however, Begich found other patents, connected with a "key personnel" list for APTI. Some of these new APTI patents were indeed a wireless system for sending electrical power.
Eastlund's patent said the technology can confuse or completely disrupt airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability to spray large areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies, and to control changes in those waves, makes it possible to knock out communications on land or sea as well as in the air. The patent said:
"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes..."Begich found eleven other APTI patents. They told how to make Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation", power-beaming systems, over-the-horizon radar, detection systems for missiles carrying nuclear warheads, electromagnetic pulses previously produced by thermonuclear weapons and other Star-Wars tricks. This cluster of patents underlay the HAARP weapon system.
'..it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a communications network even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted. Put another way, what is used to disrupt another's communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at the same time."
.'.. large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction ...
" Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device. ... molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc., concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased...
Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes. For example, Air Force documents revealed that a system had been developed for manipulating and disrupting human mental processes through pulsed radio-frequency radiation (the stuff of HAARP) over large geographical areas. The most telling material about this technology came from writings of Zbigniew Brzezinski (former National Security Advisory to U.S. President Carter) and J.F. MacDonald (science advisor to U.S. President Johnson and a professor of Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote about use of power-beaming transmitters for geophysical and environmental warfare. The documents showed how these effects might be caused, and the negative effects on human health and thinking.
The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. More than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the work of Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva. It even gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur -- the same ranges which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.
The following statement was made more than twenty-five years ago, in a book by Brzezinski which he wrote while a professor at Columbia University:
"Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J. F.MacDonald -- specialist in problems of warfare -- says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes 'could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth...In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period'...No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages , to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades."In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental control technologies for military purposes. The most profound comment he made as a geophysicist was, "The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy." While yesterday's geophysicists predicted today's advances, are HAARP program managers delivering on the vision?
The geophysicists recognized that adding energy to the environmental soup could have large effects. However, humankind has already added substantial amounts of electromagnetic energy into our environment without understanding what might constitute critical mass. The book by Begich and Manning raises questions: Have these additions been without effect, or is there a cumulative amount beyond which irreparable damage can be done? Is HAARP another step in a journey from which we cannot turn back? Are we about to embark on another energy experiment which unleashes another set of demons from Pandora's box?
As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a "more controlled and directed society" would gradually appear, linked to technology. This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how. Angels Don't Play This HAARP further quotes Brzezinski:
"Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits", Brzezinski predicted.
His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the "elite" are emerging, and the temptation to use them increases steadily. The policies to permit the tools to be used are already in place. How could the United States be changed, bit by bit, into the predicted highly-controlled technosociety? Among the "steppingstones" Brzezinski expected were persisting social crises and use of the mass media to gain the public's confidence.
In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims:
"The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi-military situations...Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One last area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous phenomena."Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The author of the government report refers to an earlier Air Force document about the uses of radiofrequency radiation in combat situations. (Here Begich and Manning note that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest radio-frequency-radiation transmitter in the world.)
The United States Congressional record deals with the use of HAARP for penetrating the earth with signals bounced off of the ionosphere. These signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometers in order to locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. The U.S. Senate set aside $15 million dollars in 1996 to develop this ability alone -- earth-penetrating-tomography. The problem is that the frequency needed for earth-penetrating radiations is within the frequency range most cited for disruption of human mental functions. It may also have profound effects on migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an undisturbed energy field to find their routes.
As if electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were not enough, Eastlund bragged that the super-powerful ionospheric heater could control weather. Begich and Manning brought to light government documents indicating that the military has weather-control technology. When HAARP is eventually built to its full power level, it could create weather effects over entire hemispheres. If one government experiments with the world's weather patterns, what is done in one place will impact everyone else on the planet. Angels Don't Play This HAARP explains a principle behind some of Nikola Tesla's inventions -- resonance -- which affects planetary systems.
Bubble Of Electric Particles
Angels Don't Play This HAARP includes interviews with independent scientists such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has a Ph.D., a long and impressive career in high-energy physics, and has been published in prestigious science journals and books. Rauscher commented on HAARP. "You're pumping tremendous energy into an extremely delicate molecular configuration that comprises these multi-layers we call the ionosphere." The ionosphere is prone to catalytic reactions, she explained; if a small part is changed, a major change in the ionosphere can happen.
In describing the ionosphere as a delicately balanced system, Dr. Rauscher shared her mental picture of it -- a soap-bubble-like sphere surrounding Earth's atmosphere, with movements swirling over the surface of the bubble. If a big enough hole is punched through it, she predicts, it could pop.
Slicing The Ionosphere
Physicist Daniel Winter, Ph. D. , of Waynesville, North Carolina, says HAARP high-frequency emissions can couple with longwave (low-frequency, or ELF) pulses the Earth grid uses to distribute information as vibrations to synchronize dances of life in the biosphere. Dan terms this geomagnetic action 'Earth's information bloodstream'., and says it is likely that coupling of HAARP HF (high-frequency) with natural ELF (extremely low frequency) can cause unplanned, unsuspected side effects.
David Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background in electronics. He described possible interactions of HAARP radiations with the ionosphere and Earth's magnetic grid:
"HAARP will not burn 'holes' in the ionosphere. That is a dangerous understatement of what HAARP's giant gigawatt beam will do. Earth is spinning relative to thin electric shells of the multilayer membrane of 'ion-o-speres' that absorb and shield Earth's surface from intense solar radiation, including charged particle storms in solar winds erupting from the sun. Earth's axial spin means that HAARP -- in a burst lasting more than a few minutes -- will slice through the ionosphere like a microwave knife. This produces not a 'hole', but a long tear -- an incision."Crudely Plucking The Strings
"Second concept: As Earth rotates, HAARP will slice across geomagnetic flux...a donut-shaped spool of magnetic strings -- like longitude meridians (on maps). HAARP may not 'cut' these strings in Gaia's magnetic mantle, but will pulse each thread with harsh, out-of-harmony high frequencies. These noisy impulses will vibrate geomagnetic flux lines, sending vibrations all through the geomagnetic web."
"The image comes to mind of a spider on its web. An insect lands, and the web's vibrations alert the spider to possible prey. HAARP will be a man-made microwave finger poking at the web, sending out confusing signals, if not tearing holes in the threads."
"Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia's geomagnetic harp are unknown, and I suspect barely thought of. Even if thought of, the intent (of HAARP) is to learn to exploit any effects, not to play in tune to global symphonies."
Among other researchers quoted is Paul Schaefer of Kansas City. His degree is in electrical engineering and he spent four years building nuclear weapons. "But most of the theories that we have been taught by scientists to believe in seem to be falling apart," he says.
He talks about imbalances already caused by the industrial and atomic age, especially by radiation of large numbers of tiny, high-velocity particles "like very small spinning tops into our environment. The unnatural level of motion of highly-energetic particles in the atmosphere and in radiation belts surrounding Earth is the villain in the weather disruptions, according to this model, which describes an Earth discharging its buildup of heat, relieving stress and regaining a balanced condition through earthquakes and volcanic action.
'Feverish' Earth
"One might compare the abnormal energetic state of the Earth and its atmosphere to a car battery which has become overcharged with the normal flow of energy jammed up, resulting in hot spots, electrical arcing, physical cracks and general turbulence as the pent-up energy tries to find some place to go."
In a second analogy, Schaefer says "Unless we desire the death of our planet, we must end the production of unstable particles which are generating the earth's fever. A first priority to prevent this disaster would be to shut down all nuclear power plants and end the testing of atomic weapons, electronic warfare and 'Star Wars'."
Meanwhile, the military builds its biggest ionospheric heater yet, to deliberately create more instabilities in a huge plasma layer -- the ionosphere -- and to rev up the energy level of charged particles.
Electronic Rain From The Sky
They have published papers about electron precipitation from the magnetosphere (the outer belts of charged particles which stream toward Earth's magnetic poles) caused by man-made very low frequency electromagnetic waves. "These precipitated particles can produce secondary ionization, emit X-rays, and cause significant perturbation in the lower ionosphere."
Two Stanford University radio scientists offer evidence of what technology can do to affect the sky by making waves on earth; they showed that very low frequency radio waves can vibrate the magnetosphere and cause high-energy particles to cascade into Earth's atmosphere. By turning the signal on or off, they could stop the flow of energetic particles.
Weather Control
Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit us hard. Their work suggests that technicians could control global weather by sending relatively small 'signals' into the Van Allen belts (radiation belts around Earth). Thus Tesla's resonance effects can control enormous energies by tiny triggering signals.
The Begich/ Manning book asks whether that knowledge will be used by war-oriented or biosphere-oriented scientists.
The military has had about twenty years to work on weather warfare methods, which it euphemistically calls weather modification. For example, rainmaking technology was taken for a few test rides in Vietnam. The U.S. Department of Defense sampled lightning and hurricane manipulation studies in Project Skyfire and Project Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated technologies that would give big effects. Angels Don't Play This HAARP cites an expert who says the military studied both lasers and chemicals which they figured could damage the ozone layer over an enemy. Looking at ways to cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them, was part of the project named Prime Argus, decades ago. The money for that came from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA, now under the acronym ARPA.)
In 1994 the Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan which includes weather control. Scientists have experimented with weather control since the 1940's, but Spacecast 2020 noted that "using environmental modification techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state are prohibited". Having said that, the Air Force claimed that advances in technology "compels a reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky topic."
40 Years Of Zapping The Sky?
As far back as 1958, the chief White House advisor on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. defense department was studying "ways to manipulate the charges of the earth and sky and so affect the weather" by using an electronic beam to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area.
In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald was associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee, and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes. MacDonald made a revealing comment:
"The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy."
World-recognized scientist MacDonald had a number of ideas for using the environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was, at the time, the dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter, "How To Wreck The Environment", for the book Unless Peace Comes, he was not kidding around. In it he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave manipulation using the planet's energy fields. He also said that these types of weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually undetectable by their victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The military's intention to do environmental engineering is well documented.
U.S. Congress' subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International Environment looked into military weather and climate modification conducted in the early 1970's. "What emerged was an awesome picture of far-ranging research and experimentation by the Department of Defense into ways environmental tampering could be used as a weapon," said another author cited in Angels Don't Play This HAARP.
The revealed secrets surprised legislators. Would an inquiry into the state of the art of electromagnetic manipulation surprise lawmakers today? They may find out that technologies developed out of the HAARP experiments in Alaska could deliver on Gordon MacDonald's vision, because leading-edge scientists are describing global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems, but also as an electrical system.
'Small Input, Big Effect'
HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A point to remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical shield protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space. This conducting plasma, along with Earth's magnetic field, traps the electrical plasma of space and holds it back from going directly to the earth's surface, says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina.
"If the ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is subsequently disturbed.".Another scientist interviewed said there is a super-powerful electrical connection between the ionosphere and the part of the atmosphere where our weather comes onstage, the lower atmosphere.
One man-made electrical effect - power line harmonic resonance - causes fallout of charged particles from the Van Allen (radiation) belts, and the falling ions cause ice crystals (which precipitate rain clouds).
What about HAARP? Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater is not much compared to the total in the ionosphere, but HAARP documents admit that thousandfold-greater amounts of energy can be released in the ionosphere than injected. As with MacDonald's "key to geophysical warfare", "nonlinear" effects (described in the literature about the ionospheric heater) mean small input and large output. Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an acupuncture model is one way to look at the possible effect of multi-gigawatt pulsing of the ionosphere. If HAARP hits certain points , those parts of the ionosphere could react in surprising ways.
Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo are underneath relatively placid regions of the ionosphere, compared to the dynamic movements nearer Earth's magnetic poles. That adds another uncertainty to HAARP - the unpredictable and lively upper atmosphere near the North Pole.
HAARP experimenters do not impress common sense Alaskans such as Barbara Zickuhr, who says "They're like boys playing with a sharp stick, finding a sleeping bear and poking it in the butt to see what's going to happen."
Could They Short-Circuit Earth?
Earth as a spherical electrical system is a fairly well-accepted model. However, those experimenters who want to make unnatural power connections between parts of this system might not be thinking of possible consequences. Electrical motors and generators can be caused to wobble when their circuits are affected. Could human activities cause a significant change in a planet's electrical circuit or electrical field? A paper in the respected journal Science deals with manmade ionization from radioactive material, but perhaps it could also be studied with HAARP-type skybusters in mind:
"For example, while changes in the earth's electric field resulting from a solar flare modulating conductivity may have only a barely detectable effect on meteorology, the situation may be different in regard to electric field changes caused by manmade ionization..."
Meteorology, of course, is the study of the atmosphere and weather. Ionization is what happens when a higher level of power is zapped into atoms and knocks electrons off the atoms. The resulting charged particles are the stuff of HAARP. "One look at the weather should tell us that we are on the wrong path," says Paul Schaefer, commenting on HAARP-type technologies.
Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology is about the military's plan to manipulate that which belongs to the world - the ionosphere. The arrogance of the United States government in this is not without precedent. Atmospheric nuclear tests had similar goals. More recently, China and France put their people's money to destructive use in underground nuclear tests. It was recently reported that the US government spent $3 trillion dollars on its nuclear program since its beginnings in the 1940's. What new breakthroughs in life science could have been made with all the money spent on death?
Begich, Manning, Roderick and others believe that democracies need to be founded on openness, rather than the secrecy which surrounds so much military science. Knowledge used in developing revolutionary weapons could be used for healing and helping mankind. Because they are used in new weapons, discoveries are classified and suppressed. When they do appear in the work of other independent scientists, the new ideas are often frustrated or ridiculed, while military research laboratories continue to build their new machines for the killing fields.
However, the book by Manning and Begich gives hope that the military- industrial- academic- bureaucratic Goliath can be affected by the combined power of determined individuals and the alternative press. Becoming informed is the first step to empowerment.
chemtrails in the sky chemtrails 2009 chemtrails scalar chemtrail photos
"chem-smear"
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
Spray Plane
 
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War by Dr. Rosalie Bertell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Toxic Barium In Chemtrails - What It Means | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fascist America in 10 easy steps History shows there are certain steps that any would-be dictator must take to destroy constitutional freedoms. Each of these 10 steps has already been initiated today in the United States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earth Brightens After Years of Dimming Earth appeared to dim from 1984 to 2001 and then reversed its trend and brightened after 2001. The change appears to have resulted from the amount of chemtrail clouds covering the planet. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques In 1972 the U.S. Gov't. renounced the use of environmental modification techniques for hostile purposes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dystopian Visionary Quotes From Brzezinski's 1970 Book | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HAARP, Chemtrails and Earthquakes – Any connection? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chemtrails - Shocking Phoenix Air Quality Test Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Is World War 3 a Reason for Chemtrails? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| What Is Gallium At 110 ppm Doing In Phoenix Air Samples? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Electrolysis & Barium The presence of barium and other metallic particulates has been repeatedly demonstrated in direct association with the aircraft aerosol operations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warning: Using a mobile phone while pregnant can seriously affect the baby. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington's New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 This Air Force paper is almost 14 years old now! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: "Owning the Weather" for Military Use | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas Chemtrail Samples Compared To Samples From Venice Italy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Run away the Ray-gun is coming : Raytheon's new weapon can throw a wave of agony nearly half a mile. It's like a truck-mounted taser for crowds. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Methodic Demise of Natural Earth (updated 11-2007) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bertell Reveals Many New Weapons of Mass Destruction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Aerosol and Electromagnetic Weapons In The Age Of Nuclear War | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| STRANGE DAYS Strange Skies One oversized webpage has it all. --- It can be viewed like a slideshow. Bravo! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MORGELLONS & CHEMTRAIL ILLNESS
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chemtrails = Aerosol spraying of pathogens, barium, "fibers". | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MISC.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| About this site | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| About me | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Occult Roots Of NASA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| "Scalar" Is Disinformation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mycoplasma page | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Radiation Poisoning Of America Russia's public exposure standards are 100 times more stringent than USA's. Russian scientists have consistently shown that, at U.S. exposure levels, humans develop pathological changes in heart, kidney, liver and brain tissues, plus cancers of all types. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mind Control: On the Possibility Of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain By Electromagnetic Induction Of Fundamental Algorithms | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Germany warns citizens to avoid using Wi-Fi Official radiation protection body also advises its citizens to use landlines instead of mobile phones, and warns of "electrosmog" from a wide range of other everyday products, from baby monitors to electric blankets. Sept. 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Controlling the Masses with Microwaves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Most Astonishing Health Disaster of the 20th Century #1 cause of death in USA video 5:09 min. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Morgellons and NanotechCould Nano machines communicate with each other inside a human body? Yes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Pentagon is Recreating the Spanish Flu -- Did you know that the 1918 influenza pandemic (misleadingly labeled the "Spanish" Flu) killed more people than World War I? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Flu Conspiracy -- Mycoplasma and upper respiratory infection, the Nazi war chest and pharmaceuticals, manmade diseases and more-- interview with Leonard Horowitz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orbs
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Some Recommended Links | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[counterterrorism] efforts." 
Modification of the ionosphere to enhance or disrupt communications has recently become the subject of active research. According to Lewis M. Duncan, and Robert L. Showen, the Former Soviet Union (FSU) conducted theoretical and experimental research in this area at a level considerably greater than comparable programs in the West.43 There is a strong motivation for this research, because
induced ionospheric modifications may influence, or even disrupt, the operation of radio systems relying on propagation through the modified region. The controlled generation or accelerated dissipation of ionospheric disturbances may be used to produce new propagation paths, otherwise unavailable, appropriate for selected RF missions.44
A number of methods have been explored or proposed to modify the ionosphere, including injection of chemical vapors and heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation or particle beams (such as ions, neutral particles, x-rays, MeV particles, and energetic electrons).45 It is important to note that many techniques to modify the upper atmosphere have been successfully demonstrated experimentally. Ground-based modification techniques employed by the FSU include vertical HF heating, oblique HF heating, microwave heating, and magnetospheric modification.46 Significant military applications of such operations include low frequency (LF) communication production, HF ducted communications, and creation of an artificial ionosphere (discussed in detail below). Moreover, developing countries also recognize the benefit of ionospheric modification: "in the early 1980's, Brazil conducted an experiment to modify the ionosphere by chemical injection."47
Several high-payoff capabilities that could result from the modification of the ionosphere or near space are described briefly below. It should be emphasized that this list is not comprehensive; modification of the ionosphere is an area rich with potential applications and there are also likely spin-off applications that have yet to be envisioned.
Ionospheric mirrors for pinpoint communication or over-the-horizon (OTH) radar transmission. The properties and limitations of the ionosphere as a reflecting medium for high-frequency radiation are described in appendix A. The major disadvantage in depending on the ionosphere to reflect radio waves is its variability, which is due to normal space weather and events such as solar flares and geomagnetic storms. The ionosphere has been described as a crinkled sheet of wax paper whose relative position rises and sinks depending on weather conditions. The surface topography of the crinkled paper also constantly changes, leading to variability in its reflective, refractive, and transmissive properties.
Creation of an artificial uniform ionosphere was first proposed by Soviet researcher A. V. Gurevich in the mid-1970s. An artificial ionospheric mirror (AIM) would serve as a precise mirror for electromagnetic radiation of a selected frequency or a range of frequencies. It would thereby be useful for both pinpoint control of friendly communications and interception of enemy transmissions.
This concept has been described in detail by Paul A. Kossey, et al. in a paper entitled "Artificial Ionospheric Mirrors (AIM)."48 The authors describe how one could precisely control the location and height of the region of artificially produced ionization using crossed microwave (MW) beams, which produce atmospheric breakdown (ionization) of neutral species. The implications of such control are enormous: one would no longer be subject to the vagaries of the natural ionosphere but would instead have direct control of the propagation environment. Ideally, the AIM could be rapidly created and then would be maintained only for a brief operational period. A schematic depicting the crossed-beam approach for generation of an AIM is shown in figure 4-1.49
An AIM could theoretically reflect radio waves with frequencies up to 2 GHz, which is nearly two orders of magnitude higher than those waves reflected by the natural ionosphere. The MW radiator power requirements for such a system are roughly an order of magnitude greater than 1992 state-of-the-art systems; however, by 2025 such a power capability is expected to be easily achievable.
Source: Microsoft Clipart Gallery © 1995 with courtesy from Microsoft.
Besides providing pinpoint communication control and potential interception capability, this technology would also provide communication capability at specified frequencies, as desired. Figure 4-2 shows how a ground-based radiator might generate a series of AIMs, each of which would be tailored to reflect a selected transmission frequency. Such an arrangement would greatly expand the available bandwidth for communications and also eliminate the problem of interference and crosstalk (by allowing one to use the requisite power level).
Source: Microsoft Clipart Gallery © 1995 with courtesy from Microsoft.
Kossey et al. also describe how AIMs could be used to improve the capability of OTH radar:
AIM based radar could be operated at a frequency chosen to optimize target detection, rather than be limited by prevailing ionospheric conditions. This, combined with the possibility of controlling the radar's wave polarization to mitigate clutter effects, could result in reliable detection of cruise missiles and other low observable targets.50
A schematic depicting this concept is shown in figure 4-3. Potential advantages over conventional OTH radars include frequency control, mitigation of auroral effects, short range operation, and detection of a smaller cross-section target.
Source: Microsoft Clipart Gallery © 1995 with courtesy from Microsoft.
Disruption of communications and radar via ionospheric control. A variation of the capability proposed above is ionospheric modification to disrupt an enemy's communication or radar transmissions. Because HF communications are controlled directly by the ionosphere's properties, an artificially created ionization region could conceivably disrupt an enemy's electromagnetic transmissions. Even in the absence of an artificial ionization patch, high-frequency modification produces large-scale ionospheric variations which alter HF propagation characteristics. The payoff of research aimed at understanding how to control these variations could be high as both HF communication enhancement and degradation are possible. Offensive interference of this kind would likely be indistinguishable from naturally occurring space weather. This capability could also be employed to precisely locate the source of enemy electromagnetic transmissions.
VHF, UHF, and super-high frequency (SHF) satellite communications could be disrupted by creating artificial ionospheric scintillation. This phenomenon causes fluctuations in the phase and amplitude of radio waves over a very wide band (30 MHz to 30 GHz). HF modification produces electron density irregularities that cause scintillation over a wide-range of frequencies. The size of the irregularities determines which frequency band will be affected. Understanding how to control the spectrum of the artificial irregularities generated in the HF modification process should be a primary goal of research in this area. Additionally, it may be possible to suppress the growth of natural irregularities resulting in reduced levels of natural scintillation. Creating artificial scintillation would allow us to disrupt satellite transmissions over selected regions. Like the HF disruption described above, such actions would likely be indistinguishable from naturally occurring environmental events. Figure 4-4 shows how artificially ionized regions might be used to disrupt HF communications via attenuation, scatter, or absorption (fig. 4.4a) or degrade satellite communications via scintillation or energy loss (fig. 4-4b) (from Ref. 25).
Exploding/disabling space assets traversing near-space. The ionosphere could potentially be artificially charged or injected with radiation at a certain point so that it becomes inhospitable to satellites or other space structures. The result could range from temporarily disabling the target to its complete destruction via an induced explosion. Of course, effectively employing such a capability depends on the ability to apply it selectively to chosen regions in space.
Charging space assets by near-space energy transfer. In contrast to the injurious capability described above, regions of the ionosphere could potentially be modified or used as-is to revitalize space assets, for instance by charging their power systems. The natural charge of the ionosphere may serve to provide most or all of the energy input to the satellite. There have been a number of papers in the last decade on electrical charging of space vehicles; however, according to one author, "in spite of the significant effort made in the field both theoretically and experimentally, the vehicle charging problem is far from being completely understood."51 While the technical challenge is considerable, the potential to harness electrostatic energy to fuel the satellite's power cells would have a high payoff, enabling service life extension of space assets at a relatively low cost. Additionally, exploiting the capability of powerful HF radio waves to accelerate electrons to relatively high energies may also facilitate the degradation of enemy space assets through directed bombardment with the HF-induced electron beams. As with artificial HF communication disruptions and induced scintillation, the degradation of enemy spacecraft with such techniques would be effectively indistinguishable from natural environment effects. The investigation and optimization of HF acceleration mechanisms for both friendly and hostile purposes is an important area for future research efforts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't Troll, if you can't add anything helpful, don't post.